Article14won't implement itself.
The compliance deadlines have started.
If your organisation is deploying high-risk AI in the EU, you need working human oversight. This applies whether you're based in the EU or not.
The EU defines high-risk AI as systems used in hiring, credit scoring, biometric identification, public services, healthcare diagnostics, and law enforcement. If your AI is a safety component in a regulated product, the same rules apply.
That's why we built Requisite around the requirements of Article 14 of the EU AI Act.
It scores your AI systems across ten domains of human oversight, identifies gaps, and gives you practical recommendations and patterns you can feed directly to your dev teams. It also generates the compliance evidence you need for your technical and business documentation.
Not regulated? If your AI affects real lives, good oversight is still good practice.
Is your AI service ready?
- Deploying AI but unsure what Article 14 actually requires?
- Don't know where your oversight gaps are?
- No way to turn compliance into something your teams can act on?
- Couldn't produce evidence if asked tomorrow?
About the name
W. Ross Ashby was a British psychiatrist and cybernetics pioneer. In the 1950s, his work on the Law of Requisite Variety proved that effective control of complex systems isn't about authority. It's about designing the right conditions for human judgement.
That was true in 1956. It's essential now.